Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Inflammation and oxidative stress markers in type 2 diabetes patients with Advanced Carotid atherosclerosis

Cardiovascular Diabetology volume 22, Article number: 248 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major global health issue and a significant risk factor for atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis in T2DM patients has been associated with inflammation, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and oxidative stress. Identifying molecular features of atherosclerotic plaques in T2DM patients could provide valuable insights into the pathogenesis of the disease.

Methods

The MASCADI (Arachidonic Acid Metabolism in Carotid Stenosis Plaque in Diabetic Patients) study aimed to investigate the increase of 2-arachidonoyl-lysophatidylcholine (2-AA-LPC) in carotid plaques from T2DM and control patients and to explore its association with plaque vulnerability as well as with blood and intra-plaque biomarkers altered during diabetes.

Results

In a population of elderly, polymedicated patients with advanced stage of atherosclerosis, we found that T2DM patients had higher systemic inflammation markers, such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and IL-1β, higher levels of oxysterols, increased triglyceride levels, and decreased HDL levels as compared to control patients. Furthermore, 2-AA-LPC was significantly enriched in plaques from diabetic patients, suggesting its potential role in diabetic atherosclerosis. Interestingly, 2-AA-LPC was not associated with systemic markers related to diabetes, such as hsCRP, triglycerides, or HDL cholesterol. However, it was significantly correlated with the levels of inflammatory markers within the plaques such as lysophospholipids and 25-hydroxycholesterol, strengthening the link between local inflammation, arachidonic acid metabolism and diabetes.

Conclusion

Our study is in line with a key role for inflammation in the pathogenesis of diabetic atherosclerosis and highlights the involvement of 2-AA-LPC. Further research is needed to better understand the local processes involved in the alteration of plaque composition in T2DM and to identify potential therapeutic targets.

Trial registration

The MASCADI was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (clinical registration number: NCT03202823).

Background

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a growing global health concern, affecting millions of people worldwide. It has been widely recognized as an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, a major contributor to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) which represent the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with T2DM [1]. Despite extensive research on this field, the underlying mechanisms involved in the development and progression of atherosclerosis in patients with T2DM remain elusive due to their multiplicity and intricate relationships. Indeed, many factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in T2DM, including inflammation, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and oxidative stress [2,3,4]. Hyperglycemia, for instance, has been associated with increased production of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), which can contribute to endothelial dysfunction and plaque formation. Dietary AGEs may also promote vascular dysfunction and inflammation, contributing to the development of vascular complications in subjects with type 2 diabetes [5,6,7]. Additionally, diabetic dyslipidemia, characterized by elevated triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, as well as reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, has been linked to increase plaque vulnerability and accelerated atherosclerosis in T2DM patients [8]. Oxidative stress, caused by an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the antioxidant defense mechanisms, has also been implicated in the development of atherosclerosis in T2DM patients [9]. Elevated ROS levels are well known to promote inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and plaque instability, thereby exacerbating the atherosclerotic process [10].

In parallel to these advances in understanding the factors contributing to atherosclerosis in T2DM, several studies indicate that atheroma plaques in diabetic patients possess unique characteristics in terms of morphology, vulnerability, composition, and calcification [11,12,13,14]. Therefore, identifying molecular features of atherosclerotic plaques in T2DM patients could provide valuable insights into the pathogenesis of the disease and lead to the development of more targeted therapeutic strategies. Recent lipidomic analyses of atheroma plaques have revealed specific signatures associated with diabetes, such as increased free cholesterol content and altered levels of specific phospholipids and lysophospholipids (LPLs) [15, 16]. Again, the mechanisms behind these alterations and their implications for atherosclerosis in T2DM patients remain unclear. In a recent cohort study of 79 patients, we observed a specific enrichment of 2-arachidonoyl-lysophatidylcholine (2-AA-LPC) among other LPC in the plaques of diabetic patients, suggesting an important role for this molecule and more generally for arachidonic acid metabolism in atherosclerosis associated with diabetes [17]. However, in a subsequent study, we did not observe any differences in AA derived mediators such as leukotriene B4 (LTB4), thromboxane B2 (TxB2) or prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in carotid plaques from control or T2DM patients [18]. The aim of the MASCADI (Arachidonic Acid Metabolism in Carotid Stenosis Plaque in Diabetic Patients) study was not only to confirm the increase in 2-AA-LPC in a larger cohort (101 T2DM and 99 control patients) but also to explore the association of this molecule with plaque vulnerability as well as with systemic and local biomarkers that are altered during the course of diabetes. Notably, we examined the relationships between 2-AA-LPC levels and inflammatory markers, triglycerides, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and oxidative stress markers such as oxysterols.

Materials and methods

The MASCADI protocol was reviewed and approved by the regional Ethics Committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Est, Dijon, France CPP Est III, CHRU Nancy, N° 2017-A00022-51) and recorded on ClinicalTrials.gov (clinical registration number: NCT03202823). Two-hundred-and-one patients were enrolled. As described previously, patients enrolled in the present study were admitted to the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery at the University Hospital of Dijon (Burgundy, France) for the surgical treatment of an atheromatous internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis whether symptomatic or not [18]. A stenosis was considered symptomatic if stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) attributed to the ICA lesion occurred within the previous 6 months before intervention. According to the trial category (Interventional research that does not involve drugs or non-CE-marked medical devices and that involves only minimal risks and constraints for the patient) and the ethics committee, all patients received written information note on the study. Oral consent was obtained from the patient and an attestation of the patient’s oral consent was signed by the investigator physician and countersigned by the patient, according to the french law in this type of trial. Blood serum samples and EDTA total blood samples were collected in parallel on the day of surgery. For all patients, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was performed within the carotid bulb, with en-bloc removal of the entire plaque, and resulting samples were frozen at -80 °C prior to lipidomic analysis.

Clinical data, imaging plaque characteristics, and biological analysis

Demographics, vascular risk factors (hypertension, active smoking, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia with detailed treatment), chronic renal insufficiency and symptomatic stenosis were collected. Patients were divided into groups according to their diabetic status: control group and diabetic group. Preoperative plaque imaging assessment included for all patients doppler ultrasound evaluating plaque echolucency and degree of stenosis according to NASCET measures, and CT angiographies (CTA) describing the presence of plaque ulceration and calcification. Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured by high pressure liquid chromatography on a Tosoh G8 analyzer (Tosoh Bioscience, Tokyo, Japan), C reactive protein (CRP), troponin I, creatinine, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides were determined on a Dimension Vista analyzer using dedicated reagents (Siemens). Perioperative hematology parameters were determined on a XN-9000 analyzer (Sysmex). Serum IL-1β levels were determined using a high-sensitivity enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ThermoFisher Scientific) with a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.05 pg/mL. IL-6 and IL-18 were determined by commercial ELISA Kit (Human IL-6 and Human Total IL-18 DuoSet ELISA Ref DY318 and DY206, R&D System, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Lysophospholipid quantitation by LC-MS2

For lipidomic analysis, carotid plaques were opened longitudinally and core samples of atheroma plaques were harvested by using 3 mm biopsy punches (Kai Medical, Solingen, Germany). Sites of harvesting were normalized between the samples by selecting the plaque area corresponding to the maximal stenosis. Plaque biopsies (2–10 mg) were crushed in an Omni Bead Ruptor 24 apparatus (Omni International, Kennesaw, USA) with 1000 µL of phosphate buffer saline and circa twenty 1.4 mm OD zirconium oxide beads (S = 6.95 m/s, T = 30s, C = 3; D = 10s). Lipids corresponding to 1 mg of tissue were spiked with a mix containing 1 mg of di14:0-PC, 1 mg of di14:0-PE, 1 mg of d18:1/17:0- SM and 0.1 mg of 14:0-LPC used as internal standards. Phospholipids and lysophospholipids were analyzed by LC-MS/MS using a 6460 mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies) equipped with an electrospray ionization source and MassHunter data system. The liquid chromatography was performed on a ZorBAX Eclipse SB-C18 (2.1 mm x 50 mm, 1.8 mm) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Plasma and plaque oxysterol quantitation by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC–MS)

Homogenates from plaques were crushed with NaCl 0.9% to obtain a final concentration of 0.33 mg tissue per ml. A volume of sample corresponding to 15 mg of tissue was saponified for 45 min at 56 °C with 60 µl of potassium hydroxide 10 mol·L− 1 and 1.2 ml of ethanol-BHT (50 mg·L− 1) containing 20 µl of standard-intern mix (µg per sample: 0.2 (25-OH-cholesterol-d6); 0.4 (27-OH-cholesterol-d6); 0.5 (7α-OH-cholesterol-d7); 0.5 (7β-OH-cholesterol-d7); 1 (7-keto-cholesterol-d7)). Sterols were extracted with 5 ml of hexane and 1 ml of water. After evaporation of the organic phase, sterols were derivatized with 100 µl of a mixture of bis (trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide/trimethylchlorosilane 4/1 v/v for 1 h at 80 °C. After evaporation of the silylating reagent, 100 µl of hexane were added. Analysis of trimethylsilyl ethers of sterols was performed by GC–MS in a 7890 A gas chromatograph coupled with a 5975 C Mass Detector (Agilent Technologies). Separation was achieved on a HP-5MS 30 m × 250 μm column (Agilent Technologies, Santa-Clara, USA) using helium as carrier gas and the following GC conditions: injection at 250 °C using the pulsed split, oven temperature programme: initial temperature 150 °C up to 280 °C at a rate of 15 °C·min− 1, up to 290 °C at a rate of 1 °C·min− 1 for 2 min. The MSD was set up as follow: EI at 70 eV mode, source temperature at 230 °C. Data were acquired in SIM mode using following quantitation ions (m/z): 131.1 for 25-OH-cholesterol; 137.1 for 25-OH-cholesterol d6; 417.4 for 27-OH-cholesterol; 423.4 for 27-OH cholestrol-d6; 456.4 for 7α–7β cholesterol; 463.5 for 7α–7β cholesterol-d7; 472.4 for 7-keto-cholesterol; 479.4 for 7-keto-cholesterol d7.

Statistical analysis

We compared patients with diabetes to patient without diabetes. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Accordingly, quantitative data were presented as medians [interquartile range] or means (standard deviation) if normally distributed. Groups were compared with a Student’s t-test or the Kruskall–Wallis nonparametric test. When indicated, significance was corrected for multiple comparison by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Qualitative data are presented as absolute value and percentage and compared by chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate. Correlations were evaluated with the Spearman correlation method. Missing data were considered to be at random and were omitted in the analysis. R studio was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Patient characteristics and biological parameters in type 2 diabetic and control patients

The baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. T2DM and control patients displayed similar demographic characteristics. Diabetic patients had a higher prevalence of hypertension and a higher BMI. No differences were found regarding the frequency of symptomatic plaques or major plaque characteristics (echogenicity, ulceration). However, the frequency of plaques with high levels of calcifications was higher in T2DM patients. The degree of stenosis was also significantly increased in diabetic patients. Regarding the biological parameters, T2DM patients presented relatively balanced glycemic parameters (Hba1c: 5.74% Vs 6.79% p < 0.0001). As expected, there was a significant increase in plasma triglyceride levels associated with a decrease in HDL levels in diabetic patients. There were minor differences in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels, but as expected the majority of the patients in both groups were under statin treatment. No differences were observed for most of the hematology parameters, however there was a nearly significant increase in absolute neutrophil counts in T2DM patients (6.61 109/L [4.83–8.72] Vs 5.54 109/L [4.83–8.72] p = 0.058)

Table 1 Baseline characteristics. Data are expressed as mean +/- S.D. (for normal distribution), medians [25th -75th percentiles] or % of the population. Groups were compared with a student’s test or Kruskall-Wallis non-parametric test; qualitative data were compared using chi-squared or Fischer’s test
Full size table

Systemic inflammation and oxidative stress markers in the study population

In order to explore systemic inflammation and oxidative stress markers, levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18 and serum concentrations of oxysterols were measured in our population. The 7-oxidized forms are primarily formed during nonenzymatic oxidative processes and are markers of oxidative stress in diabetes [19, 20], whereas 27-hydroxycholesterol and 25-hydroxycholesterol are produced enzymatically, with 25-hydroxycholesterol being actively produced upon inflammatory response. Interestingly, although the population was mainly beyond 70 years old and affected by advanced stage atherosclerosis, a significant difference was found regarding inflammatory markers, with increased levels of hs-CRP and IL-1β in T2DM patients (Table 2; Fig. 1A-B). Surprisingly, while IL-6 plasma levels were positively correlated with hs-CRP (r = 0.347, p = 4.7.10− 6) they were similar in both groups. Interestingly, there was a strong tendency toward an increase in IL-18 levels in type T2DM patients (Table 2). 7β-hydroxycholesterol and 7α-hydroxycholesterol levels were significantly increased in T2DM while there was no difference for other oxysterols (Table 2). Interestingly, hsCRP levels were positively associated with plasma triglyceride levels, both in the general population and among diabetic patients (r = 0.2746, p = 0.0057 in T2DM and r = 0.348, p = 0.0004 in controls) (Fig. 1C).

Table 2 Plasma oxysterols levels and inflammation biomarkers in controls and diabetic patients. Data are expressed as medians [25th-75th percentiles]. Groups were compared with a Mann- Whitney non-parametric test
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

A: Violin plot of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in control and T2DM patients. B: Violin plot of IL-1β levels in control and T2DM patients. C: Correlation between plasma HsCRP levels and triglycerides (R and P values were obtained by the Spearman rank test)

Full size image

Enrichment of 2-AA-LPC in carotid plaques of diabetic patients

We had previously found an increase in the relative proportion of 2-AA-LPC within other lysophosphatidylcholines in carotid plaques of type 2 diabetic patients [17]. In the present study, we could confirm these alterations in a larger cohort of patients. LPC levels were measured as previously described. As shown in Table 3 while total LPC levels were not significantly different in the two populations, we confirmed the relative increase of 2-AA-LPC in diabetic patients (0.37% in control Vs 0.45% in T2DM patients p = 0.013), thus confirming the interest of this molecule in the context of diabetic atheroma. As with plasma, we also measured oxysterols in the plaques, focusing on the most abundant oxysterols (25-hydroxycholesterol, 27-hydroxycholesterol, 7α-hydroxycholesterol, 7β-hydroxycholesterol, and 7-ketocholesterol). Levels of oxysterols within the plaque have also been associated with inflammation, oxidative stress and plaque evolution [21,22,23,24]. As indicated in Table 3, a trend toward an increase in 7-β hydroxycholesterol was found in diabetic patients, while other species were not significantly altered.

Table 3 Lysophosphatidylcholine and oxysterols in carotid plaques from control and type 2 diabetic patients. Data are expressed as mean +/- S.D. (for normal distribution), medians [25th-75th percentiles]. Groups were compared with a Student’s test or Kruskall-Wallis non-parametric test
Full size table

Independent association of 2-AA-LPC with T2D risk

After confirming the increase of 2-AA-LPC within the plaques of diabetic patients, we wanted to ensure that these molecules were independently associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes through a multivariate logistic regression, including the altered lipid markers within the plaques (7β-hydroxycholesterol, 2-AA-LPC) and the plasma markers modified during diabetes (HsCRP, triglycerides, HbA1c, and 7β-hydroxycholesterol). In all cases, 2-AA-LPC was positively and independently associated with the risk of diabetes, whether HbA1c was incorporated or not in the model (Fig. 2 AB).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A: Forest plots showing odds ratio values and 95% confidence intervals for multivariable logistic regression analysis of diabetes and biological variables. B: Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for the prediction of type 2 diabetes based on the selected biological parameters. (AUC: Area under the Curve)

Full size image

Exploring the mechanisms behind increased 2-AA-LPC in T2D plaques

Finally, in order to understand the mechanisms associated with the increase of 2-AA-LPC in the plaques of diabetic patients, we examined the association, through a correlation matrix, between 2AA-LPC, the biomarkers measured within the plaque (LPC and oxysterols) with plasma markers related to hyperglycemia (HbA1c), dyslipidemia (triglycerides), inflammation (CRP), and oxidative stress (7-β-OH-cholesterol). Interestingly, no correlation was found between the plasma markers and the markers measured within the plaque, suggesting that the alterations in the plaque composition are mainly driven by local metabolic and inflammatory processes (Fig. 3A). As for the plaque markers, 2-AA-LPC appeared to be primarily associated with markers related to inflammation (total levels of LPC, 27-hydroxycholesterol, 25-hydroxycholesterol) and negatively with oxidative stress markers (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, a strong correlation was found between the levels of 25-hydroxycholesterol and the levels of 2-AA-LPC, suggesting related production pathways (Fig. 3 AB).

Fig. 3
figure 3

A: Correlation matrix of 2-AA-LPC with systemic and carotid plaque biomarkers. Correlations were determined by Spearman’s rank correlation. Intersections between lines and columns indicate the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ) between the two parameters. Spearman ρ value is visualized by blue or red intensities. B: Correlation between relative levels of 2-AA-LPC and 25-hydroxycholesterol levels in carotid plaques (R and P values) were obtained by the Spearman rank test

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we examined the differences between T2DM and matched atherosclerotic patients in terms of plaque characteristics, lipid composition, biological parameters, systemic inflammation, and oxidative stress markers. Even within our specific cohort of elderly, poly-medicated patients with advanced atherosclerosis, we identified a characteristic diabetic signature. This included hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia (elevated TG and reduced HDL), oxidative stress (increased plasma 7α- and 7β-hydroxycholesterol), and heightened inflammation markers (hs-CRP and IL-1β) in the T2DM group. While no differences in plaque vulnerability or echogenicity between the groups was observed, we did find a significant enrichment of 2-AA-LPC in the plaques of diabetic patients, underlining the relevance of this molecule in the context of diabetic atheroma.

Our findings align with the existing literature that underscore the positive association of inflammation markers with the risk of diabetes [25,26,27,28]. The association of hs-CRP and IL-1β with plasma triglyceride levels and BMI in both the general population and diabetic patients suggests that systemic inflammation plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of diabetic atherosclerosis and is related to diabetic dyslipidemia. It is noteworthy that this heightened inflammation is apparent even in our study population, which comprises elderly patients with advanced atherosclerosis. While IL-1β was previously linked with the risk of diabetes, evidence for increased IL-1β levels is limited due to the typically low circulating levels of IL-1β [25, 29, 30]. It is therefore noteworthy that we could document here significantly higher IL-1β plasma concentrations in T2DM patients with advanced atherosclerosis. While no differences were observed for IL-6, the increase in IL-1β levels and the strong tendency for IL-18 are consistent with an activation of inflammasome. Increased activity of NLRP3 inflammasome, which acts as a molecular platform for IL-1β and IL-18 secretion, has been previously documented in T2DM. It may play an important role to increase the cardiovascular risk in these patients [31, 32].

We found mild differences in circulating oxysterol levels between diabetic and control patients, with only a moderate increase in 7α and 7β-hydroxycholesterol levels. Despite previous studies reporting increased plasma oxysterol levels in T2DM patients, this has not been consistently observed, especially when oxysterol levels were normalized by total cholesterol concentrations [20, 33, 34]. Again, these differences may be attributed to the specificities of our study population, which warrants further investigation. Interestingly, we found no significant correlation between plasma oxysterol levels and their enrichment within the plaque, as observed previously [22]. More generally, there was no relationship between blood biomarkers and the plaque molecular components. This suggests that the alterations in plaque composition are mainly driven by local metabolic and inflammatory processes and are not directly related to systemic markers [35].

The relative increase in 2-AA-LPC in the plaques of diabetic patients observed in the present study is in line with our previous observation [17]. Moreover, multivariate logistic regression analysis further supports the idea that 2-AA-LPC is independently associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes. 2-AA-LPC enrichment was not associated with systemic markers related to diabetes such as hsCRP, triglycerides or HDL cholesterol. To note, we previously observed a significant correlation of 2-AA-LPC with Hba1c [17] which is not retrieved here in a larger cohort of T2DM patients. Besides, 2-AA-LPC enrichment significantly correlated with inflammatory markers within the plaques, i.e. total LPCs, 27-hydroxycholesterol and 25-hydroxycholesterol, highlighting the potential role of inflammation in the development of diabetic atherosclerosis. Interestingly, the strong correlation between the levels of 25-hydroxycholesterol and the levels of 2-AA-LPC supports the hypothesis of related production pathways for the two molecules. A recent study has shown that 25-hydroxycholesterol accumulates in severe coronary artery lesions and demonstrated a specific role of 25-hydroxycholesterol production by macrophages to promote inflammation and vascular remodeling [23].

Our study has some limitations. The cross-sectional design prevents us from establishing causal relationships between the observed changes and the development of diabetic atherosclerosis. Furthermore, the criteria for symptomatic lesions were based on the occurrence of CV events in the six months preceding surgery, and we lack post-surgery follow-up data on the occurrence of CV events. To confirm our findings and further explore the involved underlying mechanisms, longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes are necessary.

Conclusions

Our study provides evidence for increased inflammation markers and enrichment of 2-AA- LPC in diabetic patients, strengthening the potential role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of diabetic atherosclerosis. While several inflammatory pathways could account for the increase production of 2-AA-LPC, [36,37,38,39] further research is needed to better understand the local processes involved in the alterations of plaque composition in T2DM and to identify potential therapeutic targets for the prevention and treatment of diabetic atherosclerosis.

Data availability

All the data and details of analytical methods are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

References

  1. Leon BM, Maddox TM. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatment recommendations and future research. World J Diabetes. 2015;6:1246–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. DeFronzo RA. Insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis: the missing links. The Claude Bernard Lecture 2009 Diabetologia. 2010;53:1270–87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bornfeldt KE, Tabas I. Insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and atherosclerosis. Cell Metab. 2011;14:575–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanter JE, Kramer F, Barnhart S, Averill MM, Vivekanandan-Giri A, Vickery T, et al. Diabetes promotes an inflammatory macrophage phenotype and atherosclerosis through acyl-CoA synthetase 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E715–724.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cipollone F, Iezzi A, Fazia M, Zucchelli M, Pini B, Cuccurullo C, et al. The receptor RAGE as a progression factor amplifying arachidonate-dependent inflammatory and proteolytic response in human atherosclerotic plaques: role of glycemic control. Circulation. 2003;108:1070–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldin A, Beckman JA, Schmidt AM, Creager MA. Advanced glycation end products: sparking the development of diabetic vascular injury. Circulation. 2006;114:597–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Pino A, Currenti W, Urbano F, Scicali R, Piro S, Purrello F, et al. High intake of dietary advanced glycation end-products is associated with increased arterial stiffness and inflammation in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;27:978–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg IJ. Clinical review 124: Diabetic dyslipidemia: causes and consequences. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:965–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jay D, Hitomi H, Griendling KK. Oxidative stress and diabetic cardiovascular complications. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;40:183–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Förstermann U. Oxidative stress in vascular disease: causes, defense mechanisms and potential therapies. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008;5:338–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Zieske A, Fowler DR, Weber DK, Varghese PJ, et al. Morphologic findings of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in diabetics: a postmortem study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:1266–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hong YJ, Jeong MH, Choi YH, Ko JS, Lee MG, Kang WY, et al. Plaque characteristics in culprit lesions and inflammatory status in diabetic acute coronary syndrome patients. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:339–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moreno PR, Murcia AM, Palacios IF, Leon MN, Bernardi VH, Fuster V, et al. Coronary composition and macrophage infiltration in atherectomy specimens from patients with diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2000;102:2180–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zakharov AS, Michurova MS, Terekhin SA, Kalashnikov VY, Smirnova OM, Shestakova MV, et al. [Intravascular ultrasound with virtual histology in assessment of atherosclerotic plaque composition in patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus]. Ter Arkh. 2019;91:41–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen Z, Ichetovkin M, Kurtz M, Zycband E, Kawka D, Woods J, et al. Cholesterol in human atherosclerotic plaque is a marker for underlying disease state and plaque vulnerability. Lipids Health Dis. 2010;9:61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zayed MA, Hsu F-F, Patterson BW, Yan Y, Naim U, Darwesh M, et al. Diabetes adversely affects phospholipid profiles in human carotid artery endarterectomy plaques. J Lipid Res. 2018;59:730–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ménégaut L, Masson D, Abello N, Denimal D, Truntzer C, Ducoroy P, et al. Specific enrichment of 2-arachidonoyl-lysophosphatidylcholine in carotid atheroma plaque from type 2 diabetic patients. Atherosclerosis. 2016;251:339–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ménégaut L, Laubriet A, Crespy V, Nguyen M, Petit J-M, Tarris G, et al. Profiling of lipid mediators in atherosclerotic carotid plaques from type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2022;184:102477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Iuliano L, Micheletta F, Natoli S, Ginanni Corradini S, Iappelli M, Elisei W, et al. Measurement of oxysterols and alpha-tocopherol in plasma and tissue samples as indices of oxidant stress status. Anal Biochem. 2003;312:217–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferderbar S, Pereira EC, Apolinário E, Bertolami MC, Faludi A, Monte O, et al. Cholesterol oxides as biomarkers of oxidative stress in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2007;23:35–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carpenter KL, Taylor SE, van der Veen C, Williamson BK, Ballantine JA, Mitchinson MJ. Lipids and oxidised lipids in human atherosclerotic lesions at different stages of development. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1256:141–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ceglarek U, Dittrich J, Leopold J, Helmschrodt C, Becker S, Staab H, et al. Free cholesterol, cholesterol precursor and plant sterol levels in atherosclerotic plaques are independently associated with symptomatic advanced carotid artery stenosis. Atherosclerosis. 2020;295:18–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Canfrán-Duque A, Rotllan N, Zhang X, Andrés-Blasco I, Thompson BM, Sun J, et al. Macrophage-derived 25-Hydroxycholesterol promotes vascular inflammation, atherogenesis, and Lesion Remodeling. Circulation. 2023;147:388–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown AJ, Jessup W. Oxysterols and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1999;142:1–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Spranger J, Kroke A, Möhlig M, Hoffmann K, Bergmann MM, Ristow M, et al. Inflammatory cytokines and the risk to develop type 2 diabetes: results of the prospective population-based european prospective investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam Study. Diabetes. 2003;52:812–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang X, Bao W, Liu J, Ouyang Y-Y, Wang D, Rong S, et al. Inflammatory markers and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:166–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Qu D, Liu J, Lau CW, Huang Y. IL-6 in diabetes and cardiovascular complications. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171:3595–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Aso Y, Okumura K-I, Takebayashi K, Wakabayashi S, Inukai T. Relationships of plasma interleukin-18 concentrations to hyperhomocysteinemia and carotid intimal-media wall thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2622–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Herder C, Dalmas E, Böni-Schnetzler M, Donath MY. The IL-1 pathway in type 2 diabetes and Cardiovascular Complications. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2015;26:551–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alfadul H, Sabico S, Al-Daghri NM. The role of interleukin-1β in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:901616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Grant R, Dixit V. Mechanisms of disease: inflammasome activation and the development of type 2 diabetes. Frontiers in Immunology [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2023 Aug 29];4. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fimmu.2013.00050.

  32. Lee H-M, Kim J-J, Kim HJ, Shong M, Ku BJ, Jo E-K. Upregulated NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2023 Aug 29];62:194–204. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2337/db12-0420.

  33. Murakami H, Tamasawa N, Matsui J, Yasujima M, Suda T. Plasma oxysterols and tocopherol in patients with diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia. Lipids. 2000;35:333–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stephens JW, Khanolkar MP, Bain SC. The biological relevance and measurement of plasma markers of oxidative stress in diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2009;202:321–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tomas L, Edsfeldt A, Mollet IG, Perisic Matic L, Prehn C, Adamski J, et al. Altered metabolism distinguishes high-risk from stable carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:2301–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Borradaile N, Le Goff W. Lipidomic approach provides new clues toward solving the mystery of accelerated atherosclerosis in diabetes. Atherosclerosis. 2016;251:507–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jung UJ, Torrejon C, Chang CL, Hamai H, Worgall TS, Deckelbaum RJ. Fatty acids regulate endothelial lipase and inflammatory markers in macrophages and in mouse aorta: a role for PPARγ. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32:2929–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Shiu SWM, Tan KCB, Huang Y, Wong Y. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and endothelial lipase. Atherosclerosis. 2008;198:441–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yan W, Jenkins CM, Han X, Mancuso DJ, Sims HF, Yang K, et al. The highly selective production of 2-arachidonoyl lysophosphatidylcholine catalyzed by purified calcium-independent phospholipase A2gamma: identification of a novel enzymatic mediator for the generation of a key branch point intermediate in eicosanoid signaling. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:26669–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Hélène Choubley and Victoria Bergas from the lipidomic platform for excellent technical assistance.

Funding

This work was supported by the University Hospital of Dijon Bourgogne and by grants from the Conseil Régional de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, by a French Government grant managed by the French National Research Agency under the program ‘Investissements d’Avenir’ with reference ANR-11-LABX-0021 (Lipstic Labex).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université Bourgogne, LNC UMR1231, Dijon, France

    Louise Ménégaut, Damien Leleu, Thomas Pilot, Kevin Van Dongen, Jean-Paul Pais de Barros, Thomas Gautier, Jean-Michel Petit, Charles Thomas, Maxime Nguyen & David Masson

  2. INSERM, UMR1231, Dijon, France

    Louise Ménégaut, Damien Leleu, Thomas Pilot, Kevin Van Dongen, Jean-Paul Pais de Barros, Thomas Gautier, Jean-Michel Petit, Charles Thomas, Maxime Nguyen & David Masson

  3. Université Bourgogne-Franche Comté, LipSTIC LabEx, Dijon, France

    Louise Ménégaut, Damien Leleu, Thomas Pilot, Kevin Van Dongen, Jean-Paul Pais de Barros, Thomas Gautier, Jean-Michel Petit, Charles Thomas, Maxime Nguyen & David Masson

  4. CHU Dijon, Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry, Dijon, France

    Louise Ménégaut, Damien Leleu & David Masson

  5. Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France

    Aline Laubriet, Valentin Crespy & Eric Steinmetz

  6. Lipidomic Analytic Platform, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France

    Jean-Paul Pais de Barros

  7. Department of Endocrinology and metabolic diseases, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France

    Jean-Michel Petit

  8. CHU Dijon Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Dijon, France

    Maxime Nguyen

  9. UFR des sciences de santé, Bvd Jeanne d’Arc, Dijon, 21000, France

    David Masson

Authors
  1. Louise Ménégaut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aline Laubriet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Valentin Crespy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Damien Leleu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thomas Pilot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kevin Van Dongen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jean-Paul Pais de Barros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Thomas Gautier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jean-Michel Petit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Charles Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Maxime Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Eric Steinmetz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. David Masson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, D.M., A.L. and L.M.; Methodology, D.M., M.N., C.T. and L.M.; Investigation, L.M., A.L., D.L. K. VD., V.C., M.N., T.P., JP.PDB. Writing – Original Draft, D.M.; C.T. and L.M.; Writing – Review & Editing; Resources, E.S.,V.C., A.L., M.N., T.G., and JM.P. Supervision, D.M. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Masson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The MASCADI protocol was reviewed and approved by the regional Ethics Committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Est, Dijon, France CPP Est III, CHRU Nancy, N° 2017-A00022-51) and recorded on ClinicalTrials.gov (clinical registration number: NCT03202823). According to the trial category (Interventional research that does not involve drugs or non-CE-marked medical devices and that involves only minimal risks and constraints for the patient) and the ethics committee, all patients received written information note on the study. Oral consent was obtained from the patient and an attestation of the patient’s oral consent was signed by the investigator physician and countersigned by the patient, according to the french law in this type of trial.

Consent for publication

N.A.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ménégaut, L., Laubriet, A., Crespy, V. et al. Inflammation and oxidative stress markers in type 2 diabetes patients with Advanced Carotid atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Diabetol 22, 248 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12933-023-01979-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12933-023-01979-1

Keywords

Cardiovascular Diabetology

ISSN: 1475-2840