Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Prevalence of atherosclerosis in individuals with prediabetes and diabetes compared to normoglycaemic individuals—a Swedish population-based study

Cardiovascular Diabetology volume 22, Article number: 261 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Patients with type 2 diabetes have an increased risk of death and cardiovascular events and people with diabetes or prediabetes have been found to have increased atherosclerotic burden in the coronary and carotid arteries. This study will estimate the cross-sectional prevalence of atherosclerosis in the coronary and carotid arteries in individuals with prediabetes and diabetes, compared with normoglycaemic individuals in a large population-based cohort.

Methods

The 30,154 study participants, 50–64 years, were categorized according to their fasting glycaemic status or self-reported data as normoglycaemic, prediabetes, and previously undetected or known diabetes. Prevalence of affected coronary artery segments, severity of stenosis and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) were determined by coronary computed tomography angiography. Total atherosclerotic burden was assessed in the 11 clinically most relevant segments using the Segment Involvement Score and as the presence of any coronary atherosclerosis. The presence of atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid arteries was determined by ultrasound examination.

Results

Study participants with prediabetes (n = 4804, 16.0%) or diabetes (n = 2282, 7.6%) had greater coronary artery plaque burden, more coronary stenosis and higher CACS than normoglycaemic participants (all, p < 0.01). Among male participants with diabetes 35.3% had CACS ≥ 100 compared to 16.1% among normoglycaemic participants. For women, the corresponding figures were 8.9% vs 6.1%. The prevalence of atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries was higher in participants with previously undetected diabetes than prediabetes, but lower than in patients with known diabetes. The prevalence of any plaque in the carotid arteries was higher in participants with prediabetes or diabetes than in normoglycaemic participants.

Conclusions

In this large population-based cohort of currently asymptomatic people, the atherosclerotic burden in the coronary and carotid arteries increased with increasing degree of dysglycaemia. The finding that the atherosclerotic burden in the coronary arteries in the undetected diabetes category was midway between the prediabetes category and patients with known diabetes may have implications for screening strategies and tailored prevention interventions for people with dysglycaemia in the future.

Background

Patients with type 2 diabetes have a two to four times higher risk of death and cardiovascular events than the general population [1]. Type 2 diabetes is usually preceded by a prediabetic state characterised by elevated blood glucose levels, i.e., impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), both of which carry an increased risk of cardiovascular disease [2].

From previous studies in this field, we know that an increased coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries are present in diabetes and prediabetes [3,4,5,6,7]. With modern imaging technology [8], it is possible to visualize atherosclerotic plaques non-invasively using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) [9] to identify individuals with subclinical coronary artery disease.

The prevalence of atherosclerosis in currently asymptomatic individuals with prediabetes, and particularly in those with previously undetected diabetes, has not been extensively studied. Understanding the extent of atherosclerosis in people with prediabetes and diabetes compared to normoglycaemic individuals may be useful for future screening strategies and tailored preventive interventions.

The aim of the current study was to determine the cross-sectional prevalence of asymptomatic atherosclerosis in the coronary and carotid arteries and of indicators of peripheral artery disease in individuals with previously undetected or known diabetes and prediabetes compared with normoglycaemic individuals. This was done using the large population-based Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS), using CCTA to determine the extent and characteristics of coronary artery atherosclerosis [10]. The presence of atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries was determined by ultrasound and asymptomatic peripheral artery disease was determined by the ankle-brachial index (ABI).

Methods

Study population

SCAPIS is a general population-based cohort study (www.scapis.org). SCAPIS enrolled randomly recruited study participants from the census register aged 50–64 years (51% women) at six university hospitals in Sweden during 2013–2018. History of cardiovascular disease was defined as previous myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, or percutaneous coronary intervention, either self-reported (in the study questionnaire) or provided by at least one previous diagnosis of myocardial infarction or cardiac intervention in the Swedish inpatient register (National Board of Health and Welfare), as previously described [10]. The participation rate was 50% of the invited population. A flowchart of the study population is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of study population. CCTA coronary computed tomography angiography

Full size image

The SCAPIS study was approved by the regional ethics committee in Umeå (Dnr 2010-228-31 M) and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Study procedures

The procedures of the study have previously been described in detail [10, 11]. In the present study, we used data from cardiac imaging, carotid ultrasound, physical examinations, routine laboratory tests and a comprehensive questionnaire. After an overnight fast, a venous blood sample was taken for analysis of plasma glucose, HbA1c, lipids, creatinine and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP).

Glycaemic status

The study participants were categorised according to their one single occasion fasting glycaemic status: normoglycaemic [glucose: < 6.1 mmol/L and HbA1c < 6.0% (< 42 mmol/mol)], pre-diabetes (6.1–6.9 mmol/L and/or elevated HbA1c 6.0–6.5% [42–47 mmol/mol)], previously undetected diabetes (glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L and/or HbA1c ≥ 6.5% (≥ 48 mmol/mol)] or self-reported known diabetes [12, 13]. Prediabetes can be defined by either IGT, IFG or an elevated HbA1c level. In this study, we used both IFG and an elevated HbA1c value to define prediabetes, as suggested by the recommendations of NICE [12].

Cardiac imaging

Cardiac imaging in SCAPIS has already been described in detail [10]. Briefly, coronary artery calcification was assessed in non-contrast-enhanced images from a multi-slice computed tomography scanner (Siemens, Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Imaging and analyses were performed using dedicated software for calcium scoring and coronary artery assessment. The calcium content in each coronary artery was measured and summed to give an overall CACS according to international standards.

For reporting coronary atherosclerosis from CCTA, we used the 18 coronary segment model defined by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography [14].To streamline reading and increase quality of the most important findings, readers focused on the 11 clinically most relevant segments (segments 1 through 3, 5 through 7, 9, 11 through 13, and 17), which were compulsory to report; the remaining segments were only reported if they had atherosclerosis or calcium blooming [10]. Coronary vessel status per segment was defined as: no atherosclerosis; 1–49% stenosis; >  = 50% (i.e., significant) stenosis. Segments with non- calcified plaques were also identified. The percentage frequency is given for significant stenosis (≥ 50%) and any atherosclerosis (Fig. 2a, b). Total coronary artery atherosclerotic burden was calculated using the Segment Involvement Score (SIS), a measure of the total number of coronary segments with atherosclerosis, regardless of the degree of stenosis. A SIS ≥ 4 has previously been associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes [15].

Fig. 2
figure 2

a. Distribution of CCTA-detected atherosclerosis in SCAPIS male participants according to glycaemic status. Frequency of atherosclerosis in the 11 most proximal coronary segments in men in the SCAPIS cohort. The heat map refers to frequency of any form of atherosclerosis. The number within boxes refers to the coronary stenosis status (≥ 50% /any atherosclerosis). b. Distribution of CCTA-detected atherosclerosis in SCAPIS female participants according to glycaemic status. Frequency of atherosclerosis in the 11 most proximal coronary segments in women in the SCAPIS cohort. The heat map refers to frequency of any form of atherosclerosis. The number within boxes refers to the coronary stenosis status (≥ 50%/any atherosclerosis)

Full size image

Carotid artery plaque

Atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries was determined according to a standardized protocol using a Siemens Acuson S2000 ultrasound machine with a 9L4 linear transducer (both from Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). The left and right carotid arteries were isolated and atherosclerotic plaques were identified in the common carotid artery, the bulb or the internal carotid artery according to the Mannheim consensus [16]. Accordingly, plaques were defined as focal structures penetrating at least 0.5 mm or 50% of the surrounding intima-media thickness into the arterial lumen or having a thickness > 1.5 mm, measured from the intima-lumen boundary to the media adventitia boundary. Carotid atherosclerosis was defined by ≥ 1 plaque in one or both carotid arteries.

Ankle–brachial index

Arterial blood pressure at the ankles was measured bilaterally with a Doppler pulse sensor while the subject was supine. Systolic blood pressure was measured in the dorsalis pedis artery and posterior tibial artery with a blood pressure cuff on the lower calf. The ABI was calculated for each ankle artery as the ratio between the systolic ankle pressure and the systolic brachial artery pressure. Two measurements were taken at each ankle artery until stable pressures were achieved (within ± 10 mmHg). Peripheral artery disease was defined by an ABI of less than 0.9.

Statistical methods

Background factors for the population, stratified on sex and glycaemic status, was described descriptively (n, mean, SD, median, IQR) in Table 1. Prevalence (95% C.I.) of any form of atherosclerosis, stenosis ≥ 50%, any stenosis, SIS ≥ 4, carotid plaque, CACS > 100 and ABI < 0.9 were illustrated in Figs. 2, 3, 4. Differences in the prevalence of atherosclerosis between the four glycaemic status groups were analyzed using ordinal and logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, smoking and site. To assess the association between subclinical atherosclerosis and glycaemic status, HbA1c level and diabetes duration, respectively, three outcomes were evaluated: CACS, carotid artery atherosclerosis and ABI. The CACS was divided into four groups (< 1, 1–99, 100–399, ≥ 400) and coronary vessel status per segment was defined as: no atherosclerosis; 1–49% stenosis; >  = 50% (i.e., significant) stenosis. Presence of plaques in the carotid arteries was divided into three groups: no plaque, plaque in one carotid artery or plaque in both carotid arteries. Any carotid artery plaque is hence defined as ≥ 1 plaque. ABI was dichotomized into < 0.9 resp. ≥ 0.9. A total of six ordinal and three logistic regression models were run where the three exposures were diabetes glycaemia (normal glycaemia as the reference group compared with prediabetes, undetected diabetes and known diabetes), HbA1c and years of diabetes duration. All regression models were adjusted for age, sex, pack-years of smoking, and site. Sensitivity analyses for these associations were performed, where individuals with previous myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were excluded (n = 693). Correction for possible false discovery rate due to multiple testing were done according to the method described by Benjamini and Hochberg [17]. Data were analyzed without imputations of missing data.

Table 1 Characteristics of SCAPIS participants stratified by sex and glycemic status
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

a Frequency of CACS categories, by glycaemic status as in Fig. 2 in SCAPIS participants. b Frequency of plaque in carotid arteries, by glycaemic status as in Fig. 2 in SCAPIS participants

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Prevalence of coronary computed tomography angiography–detected atherosclerosis, ultrasound detected plaque in carotid arteries and ankle-brachial index in SCAPIS participants stratified by glycaemic status in four groups

Full size image

Results

Prediabetes was detected in 3575 cases by IFG only (14.0%) and in 766 cases by elevated HbA1c only (3.0%). In 463 individuals (1.8%), prediabetes was detected both by elevated fasting glucose (IFG) and by an elevated HbA1c level. Of the 2282 SCAPIS participants classified as having diabetes, 1440 had known diabetes (5.6%) and 842 (3.3%) had diabetes not yet detected prior to the baseline visit in SCAPIS. Baseline characteristics by glycaemic status and sex are shown in Table 1.

The frequency of atherosclerosis in the 11 most proximal coronary segments in men and women by glycaemic status in the study population is shown in Fig. 2a, b. The heat map refers to the frequency of any form of atherosclerosis.

Figure 3a shows the distribution of CACS in the three glycaemic categories stratified by sex. The corresponding data for the prevalence of plaque in the carotid arteries are shown in Fig. 3b.

Figure 4 shows the prevalence of CCTA-detected atherosclerosis, carotid artery plaque and peripheral artery disease in SCAPIS participants stratified by glycaemic status in four categories: normoglycaemia, prediabetes, previously undetected diabetes or known diabetes.

Ordinal and logistic regressions analyzing associations between glycaemic status in four categories and CACS, carotid artery plaque and peripheral artery disease, respectively, are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Ordinal and logistic regressions analyzing associations between glycaemic status in four categories and CACS, carotid artery plaque and peripheral artery disease
Full size table

In short, known diabetes, undetected diabetes or prediabetes increased the likelihood of belonging to a higher category of CACS, plaque in the carotid arteries and peripheral artery disease compared to individuals with normoglycaemia. In a sensitivity analysis excluding individuals with previous myocardial infarction, coronary bypass grafting, or percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 693), the results for CACS and plaque in the carotid arteries were virtually unchanged (Table 2). Furthermore, higher HbA1c and longer diabetes duration was also associated with the odds of belonging to a higher CACS and carotid artery plaque group.

Discussion

In this study, CCTA and carotid ultrasound were used in a large random sample of the general population to determine atherosclerotic burden in individuals with normoglycaemia compared with individuals with prediabetes or diabetes. We found that subclinical atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries, as well as plaque in each carotid artery, was more common in people with diabetes and prediabetes compared to normoglycaemic participants in both men and women. In addition, significant atherosclerotic burden in the coronary arteries, as measured by SIS, was more common in people with diabetes and prediabetes than in normoglycaemic individuals. When the diabetes category was divided into undetected diabetes and known diabetes, we found that the atherosclerotic burden in the coronary and carotid arteries in the undetected diabetes category was midway between the prediabetes category and patients with known diabetes, as shown in Fig. 4. This finding may seem intuitively expected, but to our knowledge has never been shown in a large population-based study.

The prevalence of peripheral artery disease was very low. Nevertheless, diabetes was clearly associated with an ABI < 0.9 when adjusted for age, sex, site, and smoking (Table 2). It has been argued that the validity of the ABI may be reduced in diabetes, as ankle pressure may be increased by medial arterial calcification and arterial stiffness, which are more common in diabetes. However, most guidelines still recommend the use of ABI measurements in routine diabetes care because the associations between ABI and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality are similar in people without and with diabetes [18].

It is generally believed that the effects of worsened glycaemic control on increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) are quite long lasting. For example, observational studies showing increased CVD risk in people with prediabetes have an observation period of up to 10 years [19, 20].

Our population-based results suggest a clear correlation between atherosclerosis and any level of increasing dysglycaemia in two important vascular beds. Although it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about time-dependent associations from cross-sectional data, our results suggest a direct link between worsening glycaemic control and increasing prevalence of atherosclerosis.

Comparison with other studies

Several population-based imaging studies have used CT to quantify CACS as a surrogate marker of atherosclerosis [21,22,23,24]. However, no estimates of coronary artery stenosis can be derived from these studies. Previous data on the prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis in the general population are scarce.

Type 2 diabetes is a known risk factor for macrovascular disease and subclinical organ damage, e.g., defined by presence of calcification of the coronary arteries and plaque in the carotid arteries. However, with regards to prediabetes, the results of the different studies vary. Depending on which definition of prediabetes was used, IGT, IFG or elevated HbA1c, findings have varied with respect to associations with coronary and carotid artery calcification. In several studies, prediabetes was associated with increased CACS compared with normoglycaemic participants [3,4,5,6,7]. However, in one study where prediabetes was defined by IFG value only, there was no such association after adjustment [25].

Our results essentially confirm and extend previous observations with respect to diabetes and CACS. What does this study add to what is already known about this topic? First, what is new about our study is that CCTA was used to define coronary artery disease and ultrasound was used to detect plaques in the carotid artery in a large cohort of European ancestry. CCTA provides information on the precise location of coronary plaques, the degree of stenosis, the presence of non-calcified plaques and plaque morphology. We confirm the results of the CONFIRM study, in which CCTA was used to detect and compare coronary atherosclerosis in patients with diabetes compared to diabetic individuals [26]. We can also confirm the results of a smaller South Korean study where CCTA detected atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries and IFG was used to define prediabetes [27]. Second, within the diabetes category, both patients with previously undetected diabetes and those with diabetes had more calcifications in the coronary arteries than the prediabetes group. Third, to the best of our knowledge, we present population based CCTA data comparing the prevalence of atherosclerosis in patients with previously undetected diabetes and study participants with known diabetes and prediabetes. We found a stepwise increase of prevalence of atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries from participants with normoglycaemia, to those with prediabetes, and further to previously undetected diabetes and finally to those with known diabetes, presumably due to longer exposure to dysglycaemia. Data on the association between different stages of dysglycaemia and atherosclerotic burden in the coronary arteries are relevant because we know from previous, non-population-based studies in this area that large plaque burden [28] and severity of coronary artery disease [29] substantially predict future cardiovascular events and mortality.

A similar study from MESA, which used both CACS and carotid ultrasound, looked at the differences between people with metabolic syndrome or diabetes compared with participants who had neither metabolic syndrome nor diabetes. Interestingly, follow-up data from this study suggest that CACS screening strongly stratifies CVD event risk in individuals with metabolic syndrome and diabetes [30]. Furthermore, follow-up data from CONFIRM showed that in patients with diabetes, coronary atherosclerosis according to CCTA was associated with higher all-cause mortality and CVD risk, and significantly higher than in nondiabetic subjects. More importantly, patients with diabetes without coronary atherosclerosis had a comparable risk to nondiabetic subjects [31].

Against this background, our data, which provide deeper insights into the atherosclerotic burden at different stages of dysglycaemia, may have practical implications for future screening strategies for patients with dysglycaemia.

Strengths and limitations

The greatest strength of the present study is that both the degree of coronary atherosclerosis and carotid plaque were measured in a large population-based sample. The strengths of this study are, however, balanced by some limitations. Although we successfully scanned 86% of the SCAPIS population and obtained high-quality CCTA images, a more aggressive imaging strategy could be used in a real-world screening setting [10]. Additionally, in this study, we used visually detected plaques in the carotid arteries as a measure of carotid atherosclerosis according to the Mannheim consensus [16]. However, other studies in this field have used total plaque area in mm2 [32]. Furthermore, we do not have data to categorise the degree of stenosis in the carotid arteries. Regarding external validity, we know from the pilot study that low socioeconomic status was associated with a lower participation rate [33]. We also observed an association between living in an area with low socioeconomic status and increased coronary artery calcification [34]. However, this bias would most likely lead to an underestimation of the association between dysglycaemia and subclinical atherosclerosis in our study.

Finally, prediabetes was defined in this study by IFG or an elevated HbA1c level [12, 13], as we did not have 2 h post-load plasma glucose data from an oral glucose tolerance test to identify individuals with IGT. However, it is reasonable to assume that the elevated 2 h plasma glucose level is likely to provide a more accurate prediction of future cardiovascular events than prediabetes defined by fasting glucose and HbA1c [35].

Conclusions

The results of the present study show that asymptomatic atherosclerotic burden increases with increasing dysglycaemia in major vascular beds, as the coronary arteries, in a large population-based cohort. The data may have future implications for screening strategies and tailored preventive interventions for people with dysglycaemia.

Availability of data and materials

The data underlying this manuscript cannot be shared publicly for legal regulations related to the privacy of individuals that participated in the study. The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

ABI:

Ankle-brachial index

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass graft

CACS:

Coronary artery calcium score

CCTA:

Coronary computed tomography angiography

CRP:

C-reactive peptide

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

IFG:

Impaired fasting glucose

IGT:

Impaired glucose tolerance

MI:

Myocardial infarction

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

SCAPIS:

Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study

SIS:

Segment involvement score

References

  1. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzen S, Eliasson B, Svensson AM, Miftaraj M, et al. Mortality and cardiovascular disease in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1407–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Norhammar A, Tenerz A, Nilsson G, Hamsten A, Efendic S, Ryden L, Malmberg K. Glucose metabolism in patients with acute myocardial infarction and no previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: a prospective study. Lancet. 2002;359(9324):2140–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Player MS, Diaz VA, Mainous AG 3rd, Gregorie SH, Knoll ME, Everett CJ. Ethnic differences in the relationship of prediabetes with the presence of target-organ disease. Diabetes Metab. 2011;37(5):403–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.diabet.2010.12.009.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xing FY, Neeland IJ, Gore MO, Ayers CR, Paixao AR, Turer AT, Berry JD, Khera A, de Lemos JA, McGuire DK. Association of prediabetes by fasting glucose and/or haemoglobin A1c levels with subclinical atherosclerosis and impaired renal function: observations from the dallas heart study. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2014;11(1):11–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/1479164113514239.PMID:24344119;PMCID:PMC5728654.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moebus S, Stang A, Möhlenkamp S, Dragano N, Schmermund A, Slomiany U, Hoffmann B, Bauer M, Broecker-Preuss M, Mann K, Siegrist J, Erbel R, Jöckel KH. Association of impaired fasting glucose and coronary artery calcification as a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis in a population-based cohort–results of the Heinz Nixdorf recall study. Diabetologia. 2009;52(1):81–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s00125-008-1173-y.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Faeh D, William J, Yerly P, Paccaud F, Bovet P. Diabetes and pre-diabetes are associated with cardiovascular risk factors and carotid/femoral intima-media thickness independently of markers of insulin resistance and adiposity. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2007;24(6):32. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/1475-2840-6-32.PMID:17958881;PMCID:PMC2148037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Scicali R, Giral P, Gallo A, Di Pino A, Rabuazzo AM, Purrello F, Cluzel P, Redheuil A, Bruckert E, Rosenbaum D. HbA1c increase is associated with higher coronary and peripheral atherosclerotic burden in non diabetic patients. Atherosclerosis. 2016;255:102–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.11.003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Taron J, Lee S, Aluru J, Hoffmann U, Lu MT. A review of serial coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) to assess plaque progression and therapeutic effect of anti-atherosclerotic drugs. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;36:2305–17. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s10554-020-01793-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Maurovich-Horvat P, Ferencik M, Voros S, Merkely B, Hoffmann U. Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:390–402. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/nrcardio.2014.60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bergström G, Persson M, Adiels M, Björnson E, Bonander C, Ahlström H, Alfredsson J, Angerås O, Berglund G, Blomberg A, Brandberg J, Börjesson M, Cederlund K, de Faire U, Duvernoy O, Ekblom Ö, Engström G, Engvall JE, Fagman E, Eriksson M, Erlinge D, Fagerberg B, Flinck A, Gonçalves I, Hagström E, Hjelmgren O, Lind L, Lindberg E, Lindqvist P, Ljungberg J, Magnusson M, Mannila M, Markstad H, Mohammad MA, Nystrom FH, Ostenfeld E, Persson A, Rosengren A, Sandström A, Själander A, Sköld MC, Sundström J, Swahn E, Söderberg S, Torén K, Östgren CJ, Jernberg T. Prevalence of subclinical coronary artery atherosclerosis in the general population. Circulation. 2021;144(12):916–29. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055340.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bergström G, Berglund G, Blomberg A, Brandberg J, Engström G, Engvall J, Eriksson M, de Faire U, Flinck A, Hansson MG, Hedblad B, Hjelmgren O, Janson C, Jernberg T, Johnsson Å, Johansson L, Lind L, Löfdahl CG, Melander O, Östgren CJ, Persson A, Persson M, Sandström A, Schmidt C, Söderberg S, Sundström J, Toren K, Waldenström A, Wedel H, Vikgren J, Fagerberg B, Rosengren A. The Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioimage study: objectives and design. J Intern Med. 2015;278(6):645–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Type 2 diabetes: prevention in people at high risk. Type 2 diabetes: prevention in people at high risk (nice.org.uk) [Accessed 5 Apr 2022].

  13. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, Bailey CJ, Ceriello A, Delgado V, Federici M, Filippatos G, Grobbee DE, Hansen TB, Huikuri HV, Johansson I, Jüni P, Lettino M, Marx N, Mellbin LG, Östgren CJ, Rocca B, Roffi M, Sattar N, Seferović PM, Sousa-Uva M, Valensi P, Wheeler DC. 2019 ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(2):255–323. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Boxt LM, Budoff MJ, Cheng V, DeFrance T, Hellinger JC, Karlsberg RP. Society of cardiovascular computed tomography. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3(2):122–36. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jcct.2009.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ayoub C, Erthal F, Abdelsalam MA, Murad MH, Wang Z, Erwin PJ, et al. Prognostic value of segment involvement score compared to other measures of coronary atherosclerosis by computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11(4):258–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004–2006–2011). Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(4):290–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Soc B. 1995;57(1):289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hanssen NM, Huijberts MS, Schalkwijk CG, Nijpels G, Dekker JM, Stehouwer CD. Associations between the ankle-brachial index and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality are similar in individuals without and with type 2 diabetes: nineteen-year follow-up of a population-based cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(8):1731–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2337/dc12-0178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Welsh C, Welsh P, Celis-Morales CA, Mark PB, Mackay D, Ghouri N, Ho FK, Ferguson LD, Brown R, Lewsey J, Cleland JG, Gray SR, Lyall DM, Anderson JJ, Jhund PS, Pell JP, McGuire DK, Gill JMR, Sattar N. Glycated hemoglobin, prediabetes, and the links to cardiovascular disease: data from UK Biobank. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(2):440–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2337/dc19-1683.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cai X, Zhang Y, Li M, Wu JH, Mai L, Li J, Yang Y, Hu Y, Huang Y. Association between prediabetes and risk of all cause mortality and cardiovascular disease: updated meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020;370:2297. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1136/bmj.m2297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Elias-Smale SE, Proença RV, Koller MT, Kavousi M, van Rooij FJ, Hunink MG, Steyerberg EW, Hofman A, Oudkerk M, Witteman JC. Coronary calcium score improves classification of coronary heart disease risk in the elderly: the rotterdam study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1407–14. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Detrano R, Peterson D, Guerci A, Liu K, Shahar E, Ouyang P, Jackson S, Saad MF. Ethnic differences in coronary calcification: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation. 2005;111:1313–20. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1161/01.CIR.0000157730.94423.4B.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dragano N, Verde PE, Moebus S, Stang A, Schmermund A, Roggenbuck U, Möhlenkamp S, Peter R, Jöckel KH, Erbel R, Siegrist J. Subclinical coronary atherosclerosis is more pronounced in men and women with lower socio-economic status: associations in a population-based study. Coronary atherosclerosis and social status. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007;14(4):568–74. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/HJR.0b013e32804955c4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmermund A, Lehmann N, Bielak LF, Yu P, Sheedy PF II, Cassidy-Bushrow AE, Turner ST, Moebus S, Möhlenkamp S, Stang A, et al. Comparison of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis and risk factors in unselected populations in Germany and US-America. Atherosclerosis. 2007;195:e207–16. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.04.009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rutter MK, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, O’Donnell CJ, Fox CS. Fasting glucose, obesity, and coronary artery calcification in community-based people without diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(9):1944–50. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2337/dc11-1950.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rana JS, Dunning A, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M, Budoff MJ, Cademartiri F, Callister TQ, Chang HJ, Cheng VY, Chinnaiyan K, Chow BJ, Cury R, Delago A, Feuchtner G, Hadamitzky M, Hausleiter J, Kaufmann P, Karlsberg RP, Kim YJ, Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Lin FY, Maffei E, Raff G, Villines TC, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Min JK. Differences in prevalence, extent, severity, and prognosis of coronary artery disease among patients with and without diabetes undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography: results from 10,110 individuals from the CONFIRM (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes): an international multicenter registry. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(8):1787–94. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2337/dc11-2403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lim S, Choi SH, Choi EK, Chang SA, Ku YH, Chun EJ, Choi SI, Jang HC, Chang HJ. Comprehensive evaluation of coronary arteries by multidetector-row cardiac computed tomography according to the glucose level of asymptomatic individuals. Atherosclerosis. 2009;205(1):156–62. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.10.041.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, Mehran R, McPherson J, Farhat N, Marso SP, Parise H, Templin B, White R, Zhang Z, Serruys PW. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3):226–35. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1056/NEJMoa1002358.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Reynolds HR, Shaw LJ, Min JK, Page CB, Berman DS, Chaitman BR, Picard MH, Kwong RY, O’Brien SM, Huang Z, Mark DB, Nath RK, Dwivedi SK, Smanio PEP, Stone PH, Held C, Keltai M, Bangalore S, Newman JD, Spertus JA, Stone GW, Maron DJ, Hochman JS. Outcomes in the ISCHEMIA trial based on coronary artery disease and ischemia severity. Circulation. 2021;144(13):1024–38. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049755.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Malik S, Budoff MJ, Katz R, Blumenthal RS, Bertoni AG, Nasir K, Szklo M, Barr RG, Wong ND. Impact of subclinical atherosclerosis on cardiovascular disease events in individuals with metabolic syndrome and diabetes: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(10):2285–90. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2337/dc11-0816.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Blanke P, Naoum C, Ahmadi A, Cheruvu C, Soon J, Arepalli C, Gransar H, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, Callister TQ, Al-Mallah MH, Cademartiri F, Chinnaiyan K, Rubinshtein R, Marquez H, DeLago A, Villines TC, Hadamitzky M, Hausleiter J, Shaw LJ, Kaufmann PA, Cury RC, Feuchtner G, Kim YJ, Maffei E, Raff G, Pontone G, Andreini D, Chang HJ, Chow BW, Min J, Leipsic J. Long-term prognostic utility of coronary CT angiography in stable patients with diabetes mellitus. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(11):1280–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Romanens M, Mortensen MB, Sudano I, Szucs T, Adams A. Extensive carotid atherosclerosis and the diagnostic accuracy of coronary risk calculators. Prev Med Rep. 2017;6:182–186. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.03.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Björk J, Strömberg U, Rosengren A, et al. Predicting participation in the population-based Swedish cardiopulmonary bio-image study (SCAPIS) using register data. Scand J Public Health. 2017;45(17 suppl):45–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Djekic D, Angerås O, Lappas G, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on coronary artery calcification. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;25(16):1756–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shahim B, De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Gyberg V, Kotseva K, Mellbin L, Schnell O, Tuomilehto J, Wood D, Rydén L. The prognostic value of fasting plasma glucose, two-hour postload glucose, and HbA1c in patients with coronary artery disease: a report from EUROASPIRE IV: a survey from the European society of cardiology. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(9):1233–40. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2337/dc17-0245.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Linköping University. Open access funding provided by Linköping University. The main funding body of The Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS) is the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation [2016-0315]. The study is also funded by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation [2014-0047], the Swedish Research Council [822-2013-2000], VINNOVA (Sweden’s Innovation agency) [2012-04476], the University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute and Stockholm County council, Linköping University and University Hospital, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Umeå University and University Hospital, Uppsala University and University Hospital. The Swedish Research Council [2018-02527]; Heart and Lung Foundation [2021-03459; AFA Insurance to AR. European Research Council [ERC-2018-STG801965]; Swedish Research Council [VR 2019-01471]; Swedish Heart–Lung Foundation [Hjärt-Lungfonden, 20190505] to TF. Swedish Research Council [VR 2021-06432]; Swedish Heart–Lung Foundation [Hjärt-Lungfonden, 20210184] to CJÖ. The funders were not involved in the design of the study; the collection, analysis or interpretation of data; writing of the report and did not impose any restrictions regarding the publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Centre of Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, SE, Sweden

    Carl Johan Östgren, Johan Kihlberg & Anders Persson

  2. Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Carl Johan Östgren & Karin Festin

  3. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

    Julia Otten, Urban Hellman & Stefan Söderberg

  4. Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Oskar Angerås & Carlo Pirazzi

  5. Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Oskar Angerås, Göran Bergström, Anders Gummesson & Annika Rosengren

  6. Clinical Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Göran Bergström

  7. Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

    Kerstin Cederlund

  8. Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

    Gunnar Engström, Peter Nilsson & Margaretha Persson

  9. Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

    Maria J. Eriksson

  10. Department of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

    Maria J. Eriksson

  11. Medicine Unit Endocrinology, Theme Inflammation and Ageing, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

    Mats Eriksson

  12. Unit of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute at Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden

    Mats Eriksson

  13. Department of Medical Sciences, Molecular Epidemiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Tove Fall

  14. Department of Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Anders Gummesson

  15. Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Emil Hagström & Stefan K. James

  16. Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Emil Hagström & Stefan K. James

  17. Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

    Tomas Jernberg

  18. Department of Radiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Johan Kihlberg & Anders Persson

  19. Division of Diagnostics and Specialist Medicine, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences and Department of Clinical Physiology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    David Kylhammar

  20. Center for Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden

    Hanna Markstad

  21. Experimental Cardiovascular Research, Clinical Research Center, Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

    Hanna Markstad

  22. Department of Internal Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

    Peter Nilsson & Margaretha Persson

  23. Department of Clinical Sciences, Huddinge University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

    Anders Persson

  24. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

    Rebecka Renklint

  25. Department of Medicine, Geriatrics and Emergency Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Annika Rosengren

  26. Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Johan Sundström

  27. The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Johan Sundström

Authors
  1. Carl Johan Östgren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julia Otten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karin Festin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Oskar Angerås
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Göran Bergström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kerstin Cederlund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gunnar Engström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Maria J. Eriksson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mats Eriksson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tove Fall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Anders Gummesson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Emil Hagström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Urban Hellman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Stefan K. James
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Tomas Jernberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Johan Kihlberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. David Kylhammar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Hanna Markstad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Peter Nilsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Anders Persson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Margaretha Persson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Carlo Pirazzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Rebecka Renklint
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Annika Rosengren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Stefan Söderberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Johan Sundström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CJÖ, JO and JS supervised and lead the conception and design of the work, and the writing of statistical analysis plan together with KF, but all authors contributed. KF performed the statistical analyses together with CJÖ. CJÖ, JO, JS and KF drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript, gave final approval, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. The corresponding author, CJÖ, is the manuscripts guarantor and attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria, that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted and take full responsibility for the overall content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Johan Östgren.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The SCAPIS study was approved by the regional ethics committee in Umeå (Dnr 2010-228-31 M) and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

EH reports research grant funding from Sanofi-Aventis, Pfizer, Amgen, Swedish Heart and Lung foundation, and consulting or honoraria from Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, Amarin, and NovoNordisk. SS reports speakers’ honoraria from Actelion/J&J, support for attending the PAH Forum in Madrid as co-chair from Actelion/J&J and being a part of advisory boards for Actelion/J&J and Novartis. JS reports stocks in Anagram kommunikation AB and Symptoms Europe AB. SKJ reports being a part of a Data Safety Monitoring Board for New Holland (Obecetrapid study program) without personal payment. The rest of the authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Östgren, C.J., Otten, J., Festin, K. et al. Prevalence of atherosclerosis in individuals with prediabetes and diabetes compared to normoglycaemic individuals—a Swedish population-based study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 22, 261 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12933-023-01982-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12933-023-01982-6

Keywords

Cardiovascular Diabetology

ISSN: 1475-2840