Skip to main content

Peer-review policy

Peer-review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help editors determine whether the manuscript should be published in their journal. You can read more about the peer-review process here.

Cardiovascular Diabetology operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous.

The benefit of single-blind peer review is that it is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.

Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two or more experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates already published work, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board.

Peer review in Cardiovascular Diabetology is designed to ensure that the research published is 'good science'. The journal considers manuscripts spanning a wide range of scientific interests, as long as the results and conclusions are scientifically justified and not misleading. In deciding whether to accept or reject a manuscript, a reviewer asks him/herself whether the scientific community is better served by publishing or not publishing the manuscript. The suitability of a research article for publication in the journal is assessed by peer reviewers, who base their decision primarily on the article's validity and coherence but who also consider its comprehensibility and level of interest to the reader.

Cardiovascular Diabetology is affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University

New Content Item

Annual Journal Metrics

  • 2022 Citation Impact
    9.3 - 2-year Impact Factor
    9.6 - 5-year Impact Factor
    2.054 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper)
    2.361 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

    2023 Speed
    4 days submission to first editorial decision for all manuscripts (Median)
    56 days submission to accept (Median)

    2023 Usage 
    2,523,778 downloads
    3,115 Altmetric mentions