Skip to main content

Table 2 Outcomes in different groups/levels of the TyG index

From: Triglyceride-glucose index and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Year

Population

Outcome

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4

Group 5

Group 6

Continuous

Population-based cohorts

Huang et al. [14]

2022

Population-based cohort aged 45 to 64 years

HF

TyG < 8.2

[Ref]

8.2 ≤ TyG < 8.6

[aHR 0.99]

[95% CI 0.86 to 1.15]

8.6 ≤ TyG < 9.0

[aHR 1.08]

[95% CI 0.93 to 1.25]

TyG ≥ 9.0

[aHR 1.25]

[95% CI 1.08 to 1.45]**

–

–

Per 1-SD (0.60) increase

[aHR 1.15]

[95% CI 1.10 to 1.21]***

Jung et al. [32]

2022

Adult cancer survivor patients

HF

TyG < 8.0

[Ref]

8.0 ≤ TyG < 8.5

[aHR 0.95]

[95% CI 0.81 to 1.11]

8.5 ≤ TyG < 9.0

[aHR 0.94]

[95% CI 0.80 to 1.10]

9.0 ≤ TyG < 9.5

[aHR 1.06]

[95% CI 0.89 to 1.26]

9.5 ≤ TyG < 10

[aHR 0.95]

[95% CI 0.75 to 1.22]

TyG ≥ 10

[aHR 1.01]

[95% CI 0.67 to 1.52]

–

Li et al. [33]

2022

Population-based adult cohort (Kailuan cohort)

HF

TyG ≤ 8.18

[Ref]

8.18 < TyG ≤ 8.57

[aHR 1.00]

[95% CI 0.88 to 1.12]

8.57 < TyG ≤ 9.05

[aHR 1.12]

[95% CI 1.00 to 1.26]*

TyG > 9.05

[aHR 1.23]

[95% CI 1.09 to 1.39]***

–

–

Per 1-unit increase

[aHR 1.17]

[95% CI 1.10 to 1.24]***

Li et al. [33]

2022

Population-based adult cohort (Hong Kong cohort)

HF

TyG ≤ 6.89

[Ref]

6.89 < TyG ≤ 7.31

[aHR 1.07]

[95% CI 0.92 to 1.23]

7.31 < TyG ≤ 7.80

[aHR 1.17]

[95% CI 1.01 to 1.35]*

TyG > 7.80

[aHR 1.21]

[95% CI 1.04 to 1.40]**

–

–

Per 1-unit increase

[aHR 1.13]

[95% CI 1.05 to 1.22]**

Li et al. [9]

2023

Population-based adult cohort

HF

TyG < 8.12

[Ref]

8.12 ≤ TyG < 8.55

[aOR 0.91]

[95% CI 0.52 to 1.56]

8.55 ≤ TyG < 9.00

[aOR 1.13]

[95% CI 0.71 to 1.80]

TyG ≥ 9.00

[aOR 1.45]

[95% CI 0.87 to 2.41]

–

–

Per 1-unit increase

[aOR 1.34]

[95% CI 1.02 to 1.76]*

Muhammad et al. [36]

2023

Population-based cohort

HF

TyG < 4.38

4.38 ≤ TyG < 4.55

[aHR 1.04]

[95% CI 0.91 to 1.18]

4.55 ≤ TyG < 4.74

[aHR 1.00]

[95% CI 0.88 to 1.15]

TyG ≥ 4.74

[aHR 1.12]

[95% CI 0.97 to 1.29]

–

–

Per 1-unit increase

[aHR 1.30]

[95% CI 1.08 to 1.56]**

Si et al. [40]

2020

Population-based cohort aged 40 to 69 years

HF

Q1

[Ref]

Q2

[OR 1.05]

[95% CI 0.93 to 1.18]

Q3

[OR 1.12]

[95% CI 1.00 to 1.27]

Q4

[OR 1.11]

[95% CI 0.98 to 1.25]

–

–

–

Xu et al. [15]

2022

Population-based cohort

HF

TyG < 8.16

[Ref]

8.16 ≤ TyG < 8.55

[aHR 0.95]

[95% CI 0.81 to 1.10]

8.55 ≤ TyG < 9.00

[aHR 1.01]

[95% CI 0.87 to 1.18]

TyG ≥ 9.00

[aHR 1.24]

[95% CI 1.07 to 1.44]*

–

–

–

Zeng et al. [45]

2022

Population-based adult cohort

HF

Q1 (median 7.3)

[Ref]

Q2 (median 7.7)

[aHR 1.2]

[95% CI 0.5 to 3.1]

Q3 (median 8.0)

[aHR 1.7]

[95% CI 0.7 to 4.1]

Q4 (median 8.4)

[aHR 3.4]

[95% CI 1.4 to 8.0]***

–

–

–

Type 2 diabetes

Abuduaini et al. [24]

2023

Cardiomyopathy and T2DM

HF

TyG ≤ 7.21

[Ref]

7.21 < TyG < 7.89

[aHR 2.66]

[95% CI 1.16 to 6.07]*

TyG ≥ 7.89

[aHR 7.33]

[95% CI 3.42 to 15.7]***

–

–

–

–

Chen et al. [26]

2023

Hospitalized patients with T2DM and LVEF ≥ 50%

GLS < 18%

TyG ≤ 8.89

[Ref]

8.89 < TyG < 9.44

[aHR 1.28]

[95% CI 0.30 to 5.55]

9.44 < TyG < 9.83

[aHR 4.52]

[95% CI 1.12 to 18.3]*

TyG > 9.83

[aHR 5.23]

[95% CI 1.12 to 24.5]*

–

–

–

Guo et al. [13]

2021

Patients with chronic HF and T2DM

CV death or HF rehospitalization

TyG < 8.55

[Ref]

8.55 ≤ TyG < 9.06

[aHR 1.66]

[95% CI 1.02 to 2.70]*

TyG ≥ 9.06

[aHR 2.46]

[95% CI 1.51 to 4.01]*

–

–

–

–

Sun et al. [41]

2023

Adult patients with T2DM

SLVD

–

–

–

–

–

–

Per 1-unit increase

[aOR 1.61]

[95% CI 1.00 to 2.59]*

Tai et al. [42]

2022

Patients with T2DM

Fatal or hospital HF

TyG ≤ 9.00

[Ref]

9.00 < TyG ≤ 9.47

[aHR 1.15]

[95% CI 0.91 to 1.45]

9.47 < TyG ≤ 9.95

[aHR 1.05]

[95% CI 0.91 to 1.20]

TyG > 9.95

[aHR 1.17]

[95% CI 1.07 to 1.29]**

–

–

Per 1-SD increase

[aHR 1.25]

[95% CI 1.11 to 1.40]***

Coronary artery disease

Huang et al. [30]

2022

CAD patients who underwent PCI

Worsening HF

TyG ≤ 8.51

[Ref]

8.51 < TyG ≤ 8.98

[aHR 1.31]

[95% CI 0.82 to 2.07]

TyG > 8.98

[aHR 2.44]

[95% CI 1.59 to 3.72]***

 

–

–

Per 0.1-unit increase

[aHR 1.07]

[95% CI 1.05 to 1.10]***

Mao et al. [35]

2019

Patients with NSTE-ACS

CHF

–

–

–

–

–

–

Per 1-unit increase

[aHR 0.41]

[95% CI 0.08 to 2.06]

Sun et al. [18]

2023

Patients with ischemic HF undergoing elective PCI

MACE

TyG < 8.54

[Ref]

8.54 ≤ TyG < 8.93

[aHR 1.31]

[95% CI 1.02 to 1.68]*

8.93 ≤ TyG < 9.41

[aHR 1.71]

[95% CI 1.34 to 2.18]***

TyG ≥ 9.41

[aHR 1.92]

[95% CI 1.48 to 2.49]***

–

–

Per 1-unit increase

[aHR 1.41]

[95% CI 1.22 to 1.62]***

Heart failure

Cheng et al. [17]

2023

Non-diabetic patients with acute HF and without ACS

In-hospital mortality

TyG ≤ 9.44

[Ref]

TyG > 9.44

[aOR 1.89]

[95% CI 1.13 to 3.47]*

–

–

–

–

–

Han et al. [29]

2022

Patients with HF

In-hospital mortality

TyG < 8.25

[Ref]

8.25 ≤ TyG < 8.78

[aOR 1.54]

[95% CI 1.00 to 2.35]*

TyG ≥ 8.78

[aOR 2.08]

[95% CI 1.28 to 3.35]**

–

–

–

Per 1-unit increase

[aOR 1.89]

[95% CI 1.42 to 2.50]***

Huang et al. [31]

2022

Patients with acute decompensated HF

All-cause mortality

TyG < 8.83

[Ref]

8.83 ≤ TyG < 9.32

[aHR 1.07]

[95% CI 0.67 to 1.74]

TyG ≥ 9.32

[aHR 2.09]

[95% CI 1.23 to 3.55]**

–

–

–

–

Shi et al. [39]

2022

Patients with HF

HF readmission

TyG < 7.36

[aOR 1.65]

[95% CI 1.09 to 2.45]*

Q2

[Ref]

Q3

[aOR 1.18]

[95% CI 0.71 to 1.80]

Q4

[aOR 1.12]

[95% CI 0.72 to 1.82]

–

–

–

Yang et al. [16]

2021

Hospitalized HF patients with CMR examination

Mortality or HF hospitalization

–

–

–

–

–

–

Per 1-SD increase

[aHR 2.01]

[95% CI 1.01 to 4.01]*

  1. T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus, HF heart failure, Ref: reference, TyG index triglyceride-glucose index, HR hazard ratio, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, GLS global longitudinal strain, ACS acute coronary syndrome, CV cardiovascular, CAD coronary artery disease, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, CHF congestive heart failure, SLVD subclinical left ventricular dysfunction, MACE major adverse cardiovascular events, CMR cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
  2. * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001