Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of CMR findings between controls, HTN (T2DM−) group and HTN (T2DM+) group after adjustment for age, sex, BMI and heart rate

From: The additive effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus on left ventricular deformation and myocardial perfusion in essential hypertension: a 3.0 T cardiac magnetic resonance study

 

Controls

HTN (T2DM−)

HTN (T2DM+)

P value

n = 37

n = 70

n = 40

LV geometry and function

 LVMI (g/m2)

44.55 ± 8.06

58.07 ± 16.02*

55.22 ± 13.22*

< 0.001

 LVEDVI (mL/m2)

75.92 ± 12.42

78.26 ± 17.00

76.95 ± 13.51

0.223

 LVESVI (mL/m2)

28.51 ± 7.62

28.65 ± 10.71

29.39 ± 9.02

0.437

 LVEF (%)

62.85 ± 6.20

63.84 ± 7.04

63.00 ± 7.66

0.408

 Stroke volume (mL)

78.09 ± 12.04

83.99 ± 21.10

80.18 ± 14.66

0.082

 Cardiac index (L/min/m2)

3.27 ± 0.60

3.70 ± 0.86

3.37 ± 0.72

0.068

 LV remodeling index (g/mL)

0.60 ± 0.12

0.75 ± 0.17*

0.73 ± 0.18*

0.001

Myocardial strain

 GRPS (%)

38.98 ± 8.14

36.57 ± 10.81*

31.77 ± 10.91*§

< 0.001

 GCPS (%)

− 21.44 ± 2.74

− 21.41 ± 3.10

− 19.88 ± 3.59*§

0.004

 GLPS (%)

− 14.94 ± 2.42

− 13.14 ± 2.66*

− 11.75 ± 3.69*§

< 0.001

Myocardial perfusion

 Upslope

2.73 ± 1.17

3.30 ± 1.29*

1.83 ± 0.74*§

< 0.001

 TTM (s)

26.90 ± 10.15

23.30 ± 8.78

31.65 ± 12.57*§

0.002

 MaxSI

23.03 ± 8.03

27.10 ± 9.64*

18.05 ± 6.78§

< 0.001

  1. HTN, hypertension; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus;LV, left ventricular; M, mass; EDV, end diastolic volume; ESV, end systolic volume; I, indexed to BSA; EF, ejection fraction; GRPS, global radial peak strain; GCPS, global circumferential peak strain; GLPS, global longitudinal peak strain; TTM, time to maximum signal intensity; MaxSI, max signal intensity
  2. * p < 0.05 versus controls
  3. §p < 0.05 versus HTN (T2DM−) group