Correction of p-value for HbA1c in abstract from 0.01 to 0.02
Tommy Jönsson, Swedish Health Care
16 July 2014
I am the principal author of "Beneficial effects of a Paleolithic diet on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes: a randomized cross-over pilot study" in Cardiovascular Diabetology, and I have just been made aware of an error in the article which I want to correct. The p-value for HbA1c after the Paleolithic diet, when compared in a t-test to after the diabetes diet, was 0.0164807189350042. So the p-value 0.02 for HbA1c presented in Table 3 is correct, and it is incorrectly rounded down and presented as 0.01 in the abstract. The error has no effect on the scientific content and conclusions in the article.
Correction of p-value for HbA1c in abstract from 0.01 to 0.02
16 July 2014
I am the principal author of "Beneficial effects of a Paleolithic diet on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes: a randomized cross-over pilot study" in Cardiovascular Diabetology, and I have just been made aware of an error in the article which I want to correct. The p-value for HbA1c after the Paleolithic diet, when compared in a t-test to after the diabetes diet, was 0.0164807189350042. So the p-value 0.02 for HbA1c presented in Table 3 is correct, and it is incorrectly rounded down and presented as 0.01 in the abstract. The error has no effect on the scientific content and conclusions in the article.Competing interests
I have no competing interests.